It's never the break-in, it's always the cover up.
(Ce n'est pas tout à fait vrai mais c'est très loin d'être tout à fait faux.)
Ceci m'y a fait repenser.
If Frist didn’t do anything wrong, why can’t he be honest about what he knew?
It's never the break-in, it's always the cover up.
If Frist didn’t do anything wrong, why can’t he be honest about what he knew?
People who make prediction their business—people who appear as experts on television, get quoted in newspaper articles, advise governments and businesses, and participate in punditry roundtables—are no better than the rest of us (at predicting). When they’re wrong, they’re rarely held accountable, and they rarely admit it, either. (...) Tetlock claims that the better known and more frequently quoted they are, the less reliable their guesses about the future are likely to be. The accuracy of an expert’s predictions actually has an inverse relationship to his or her self-confidence, renown, and, beyond a certain point, depth of knowledge. People who follow current events by reading the papers and newsmagazines regularly can guess what is likely to happen about as accurately as the specialists whom the papers quote.

* Latest SES-CPAC rolling poll (taken Friday) tells us that Conservatives rose by 4%, NDP down 35%, Libs down 2%, Bloc and Green unchanged. Liberals' lead down to 9%.
Technorati tag: canada election

Parc du 6 décembre. La cérémonie commémorant la tragédie de Polytechnique, où 14 jeunes femmes ont perdu la vie en 1989, vient de se terminer.Il avait exactement le bon ton. Et dans son cas, on ne peut pas parler de récupération politique. J'ai connu M. Layton en 1999 à l'occasion du 10ème anniversaire. Son engagement dans ce domaine n'est pas nouveau.
(...)
Contrairement à la ministre Liza Frulla, également présente, le chef néo-démocrate quitte les lieux, l'air grave, refusant de parler aux journalistes. M. Layton était ici à titre personnel, répète son entourage, pendant que le cliquetis des caméras résonne autour de lui.
"Je garde le silence, a-t-il dit, sans son sourire caractéristique. Cette journée est celle des femmes qui nous parlent de la violence des hommes."
Why hasn't Harper had a bigger boost after dominating the news in the first week? Maybe because it's only been a week?
Allan Gregg, head of the Strategic Counsel, says it better: "There's a sheen of cynicism that coats all political attitudes and people are very savvy to the extent that they think what happens in a campaign is that politicians are doing those things to curry favour. But if I was advising him (Heraper), I'd say, 'We just gotta keep on doing it.'" Anyways, both Harper and Partin need makeovers he says.
I think quotes like "This is just like a caucus meeting, by the way" delivered while making his child-care funding announcement at a sometimes-raucous day-care centre in Ottawa or his reply that "Let me just say -- take it as you will -- you look no different than usual" to Paul Wells's question about if he (Paul) looked weird to him (Stephen) through the teleprompter screen, will go a long way in humanizing Harper. (Although the teleprompter has to go.)
Technorati tag: canada election
Technorati tag: canada election
Technorati tag: canada election
On another (lighter) note:
Prior to this week (...), senior staffers at both the White House and Defense have privately vented frustration and even bitterness at the absence or incompetence of what is known as the war's "public diplomacy." (...)Commençons en disant que la phrase "Bush media model has been to ignore the polls, skip the spin and govern for results" est fausse. "Ignore the polls", peut-être. Le reste, faux.
This is the Alfred E. Neuman, "What, me worry?" school of public relations. It doesn't seem quite appropriate for a major war.
I don't think the Bushies are numb to seeing their public standing dissed and downgraded. I think they've concluded this is a game that's rigged against them, something over which they have little control. (...)
In contrast, the Bush media model has been to ignore the polls, skip the spin and govern for results. (...)
For this White House, the mainstream media's spin is like bad weather--uncontrollable. (...)
The Bush administration has underestimated the changed nature of modern media. The mainstream media alone is not the problem. All these political subjects--the war, immigration--get discussed at length, all the time, on talk shows and across the great expanses of the Web wilderness. In this new environment, the emotional content has become stronger and even more important than the facts, such as they are. (...)